Transport for London had to temporarily switch off a ULEZ camera and refund more than 900 drivers after it repeatedly snared motorists who had not actually crossed into the city.
Harrow Council asked TfL to urgently look into the positioning of boundary cameras after receiving mutiple reports of drivers being mistakenly fined at one spot in the borough.
The Ultra Low Emission Zone was expanded to outer London on August 29, meaning motorists in all 32 boroughs will be charged £12.50 per day if they drive vehicles that do not meet emissions standards.
One of the new boundary lines now splits the borough of Harrow in two.
Residents have been complaining that they have received warning letters and fines from TfL for driving through the Old Redding junction towards Common Road, which falls outside the expanded zone.
Harrow Council’s leadership called the implementation a “disaster” and urged TfL to rectify the problem.
The transport authority has since switched off and repositioned the camera.
Speaking at a recent full council meeting, deputy leader Cllr Marilyn Ashton criticised the scheme for being “badly implemented”, calling it an “unfair tax” on drivers.
She said: “We in Harrow have one particular borough, Hertfordshire, which abuts the northern boundary. Most of it is in Stanmore ward, some of it just goes into Harrow Weald, and there are severe difficulties.”
“People have been photographed, unfortunately, driving along Old Redding and turning left into Common Road.
"A lady was telling me she had been fined £12.50 and she couldn’t understand why because she was driving on a non-ULEZ road.”
Cllr Ashton added: "I just think this is a complete disaster for people. It’s not thought through properly, it’s not implemented correctly, there’s all sorts of problems now with the anomalies of Brockley Hill, which is not in ULEZ but there’s cameras everywhere.”
TfL has confirmed that the camera at the junction was in the wrong position.
It claims the owners of 927 vehicles have subsequently been refunded because of the error and given assurances that all boundary cameras have now been checked and are positioned correctly.
A TfL spokesperson said: “We apologise for this error. Unfortunately this camera was incorrectly positioned. It was switched off once we were informed of the error and has been repositioned. We have refunded any charges that were wrongly issued.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel